Talk:Butternut–SEC War: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(whoopsydaisy) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3:
:"Attacks on Cane Corp and Loss of Gang Shi and Butternut combatants" is an excessively lengthy title, and half of it is unnecessary anyways- in war, you lose combatants, that doesn't need to be noted in the header. And the nether infrastructure section could be kept, but "Combat in Icenia City" should be changed to "Battles in Icenia City". In addition, the "Butternut forces encountering resistance" photo is quite irrelevant and not necessary, it shows a guy on fire and other soldiers in armor. The "SEC POV Skybridging the Butternut Vault" photo is also not worthy to be in the article, it has some ppl standing, not relevant. We don't need that many photos in the article, it's excessive, and plus having them all aligned on the right looks ugly. Having too many sections, some for quite trivial events, is also excessive and what I was trying to avoid. [[User:Presidentofyes12|Presidentofyes12]] ([[User talk:Presidentofyes12|talk]]) 22:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
::yes, some of the header titles are quite long and we could probably trim them down. but i disagree about merging sections just because they are short. they indicate a timeline of notable events. even though an event may be notable, there may not be that much to write about them. e.g. a banwave is a notable event distinct from other events, as it is admin intervention within a war that could have had notable effects. it didn’t, but it still marks uncertainty at the time of the war that is useful to understanding it. i would elaborate more but i am busy rn; please don’t force redo your changes [[User:Pontaoski|Pontaoski]] ([[User talk:Pontaoski|talk]]) 22:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
| |||