Talk:Butternut–SEC War: Difference between revisions

[[User:Presidentofyes12]] hey uh, events can overlap. can you avoid removing large swathes of the divison of events into the timeline? thanks [[User:Pontaoski|Pontaoski]] ([[User talk:Pontaoski|talk]]) 14:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

:Firstly you did not only revert my removal of divisions, you also reverted me changing the headers to more valid and senseful names (invasion -> war). Secondly, the banning of some Butternutters is not itself sufficiently notable for a section by itself- for God's sake, it is two sentences in length. Freeing the Gang Shi fighters was also not notable enough for an entire section dedicated to it, it's about one quite short paragraph in length. I understand wanting to split off the "Exile of Icenian Government" part to its own section, so that could be kept, but "On 13 June, Gwua stated that the war would not end with the fall of Icenia, and that it was "just the beginning of the campaign", with the rest of the Security Enhancement Coalition firmly within their crosshairs.[citation needed]. Also on June 13th, SEC fighters pearled a Butternut login in a door tunnel at Whole Foods." and "The same day, Bloom issued a bounty of 128 diamond blocks and Diet_Cola’s spawnbook for the pearl of chosentwicelol.[7]" should be in the same paragraph.

 

::yes, some of the header titles are quite long and we could probably trim them down. but i disagree about merging sections just because they are short. they indicate a timeline of notable events. even though an event may be notable, there may not be that much to write about them. e.g. a banwave is a notable event distinct from other events, as it is admin intervention within a war that could have had notable effects. it didn’t, but it still marks uncertainty at the time of the war that is useful to understanding it. i would elaborate more but i am busy rn; please don’t force redo your changes [[User:Pontaoski|Pontaoski]] ([[User talk:Pontaoski|talk]]) 22:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)