Talk:RainOfPain125: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
silly billy versus logic
No edit summary |
(silly billy versus logic) |
||
Line 184:
If it is still necessary, then I can provide my side of events vs yours to be "unbiased", but you'll need loads of evidence to support it.
=July 6th, 2022 RainOfPain125 v tybug=
Please provide reasoning on why giving context to the situation regarding my ban on CivUniverse was "bias" that needed to be removed. It was done in [https://civwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RainOfPain125&diff=52299&oldid=52295&diffmode=source this edit]. Explaining that Ian is a controversial person is not biased, as it is generally well understood that their server and their character is controversial (refer to [[CivUniverse]] and [[Ian_X12]] pages respectively). It is also not "bias" to point out, considering the ban was done after the server had already closed, that there was little to no practical reason behind the perma ban besides for clout or making him look better. Not to mention, if Ian wanted to make his server a "safer place" then he would have been perma banning the '''real doxers, alt addicts, and known pedophiles from this damn server while it was online and running'''.
| |||