Talk:United Defensive Front: Difference between revisions
explain why including any reference to LSD in the chic-fil-a crisis section is wrong
No edit summary |
MrJoCrafter (talk | contribs) (explain why including any reference to LSD in the chic-fil-a crisis section is wrong) |
||
Line 3:
Previous edit had stated [[LSD]] had been involved, although [[Chic-Fil-A Crisis]] states that the LSD was not involved, despite [[New Sovia]] also participating in the crisis and being involved in the event. Need clarification from parties.
[[User:Specificlanguage|Specificlanguage]] ([[User talk:Specificlanguage|talk]]) 19:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
* ashnwill specifically said LSD had no party in the crisis and that only one individual affiliated with LSD (iakwai) was involved in the incident. therefore, removing all references to "LSD" being involved with the crisis is the only appropriate decision. - [[MrJoCrafter]] [[Talk:MrJoCrafter]] 17:52 UTC 29 January 2023
| |||