Talk:RainOfPain125: Difference between revisions

== July 2nd 2022 RainOfPain125 ==

===Removing Content =/= Removing Bias===

====MCSpenguin-RainOfPain125 incident====

Making nonsense edits like removing the backstory of events leading to MCSpenguin pearling me doesn't fix any bias, it simply removes the content altogether - which is not what Neutrality Notice's are for.

I can remake the story of events, and then provide the MCSpenguin side in order to stay neutral. I can prove that the IWW aquired a new farm in the south, I can prove that I intended on creating a Capital town in the south near the farm, I can prove that there were abandoned nations in Napistan, MCSpenguin can only prove that I was at the wrong place at the wrong time for the right reasons.

However, I do not like the ahistorical explanation of what followed. The IWW page claims this was a dispute between the Union and penguin, when it was merely nothing more than my own wrongdoing and should be presented as such. The page also goes on to claim that me being pearled for two weeks was the reason we created the Union Organizer position,which is factually wrong -

We held a vote in the Anarchist Communist Association discord regarding making our own dedicated discord for IWW on civ, mostly for the purpose of delegating positions and roles to people. Even though UO as a title wasn't made yet, it's intended purpose already began way before I got pearled.

====Arctica====

This can be moved as a footnote in Napistan's & IWW's history. I will refrain from calling the continent Napistan.

====IWW Vote Rigging & Intention to Violently Coup====

At the end of the day, it's not a stretch to say the intended purpose of manipulating the vote was to rig it in order to avoid the hassle of a hostile takeover of the IWW. It is made very clear on the IWW page that bastions/snitches were taken over by the crowd of traitors that aimed to subvert the Union, under the guise of "what if Rain doesn't honor the vote results?".

I also know that the traitors refused to participate in the vote because they didn't believe it could be as easy as voting themselves into power, using the claim again that I would not honor the results of a rigged vote. Why would they prepare to violently take over the nation if the vote didn't go their way, if they didn't even plan on voting to begin with? The answer is obvious.

And again, it's not a stretch to say deleting honest votes to recast new one's was vote manipulation because at no point before or after this vote did the IWW ever allow deleting and recasting votes - there was no history, traditions, or rule that said it was a thing. Nowhere on the vote for Server Organizer did it say it was a thing. It was the only vote where a second person had access to the voting back-end and it was the only time that someone abused their power to mess with the votes in order to get their desired result. Most people would call that manipulation.

If it is still necessary, then I can provide my side of events vs yours to be "unbiased", but you'll need loads of evidence to support it.