Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

From CivWiki
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Metriximor in topic Server list cleanup
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
Line 19: Line 19:


as a separate point, is there any interest in factoring in how active a server actually is when deciding whether it belongs on the main page? eg. vintageciv is still techinically Live but hasn't seen any kind of activity or development for like 10 months, and this was the same issue with civrealms and devoted hell before they Officially went offline. -[[User:Des23|Des23]] ([[User talk:Des23|talk]]) 15:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
as a separate point, is there any interest in factoring in how active a server actually is when deciding whether it belongs on the main page? eg. vintageciv is still techinically Live but hasn't seen any kind of activity or development for like 10 months, and this was the same issue with civrealms and devoted hell before they Officially went offline. -[[User:Des23|Des23]] ([[User talk:Des23|talk]]) 15:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

my take: split live servers into upcoming and live, show only servers on main page that have had y edits on the last x days --[[User:Metriximor|Metriximor]] ([[User talk:Metriximor|talk]]) 15:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 6 May 2023

Where do I go to ask questions about CivWiki?

I wanna know if it's appropriate if I made a shitter category for the most infamous players ex twinkie, vanax, saren solaris, etc


really:

https://imgur.com/a/0I641im


yes really:

Ikowam4.jpeg

Server list cleanup

wanted to get the ball rolling since spec suggested it. i honestly think we can safely discount "test servers" like civrev and civredemption from the list since they're not really civ servers in and of themselves. civvie and civcubed also straight up just aren't live so i'm not sure why they're on the list to begin with, their creators should be adding themselves to list of civ servers in development instead (maybe a link to that page could be put on the main page somewhere?).

as a separate point, is there any interest in factoring in how active a server actually is when deciding whether it belongs on the main page? eg. vintageciv is still techinically Live but hasn't seen any kind of activity or development for like 10 months, and this was the same issue with civrealms and devoted hell before they Officially went offline. -Des23 (talk) 15:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

my take: split live servers into upcoming and live, show only servers on main page that have had y edits on the last x days --Metriximor (talk) 15:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]