RainOfPain125: Difference between revisions

m
"rain did not compile information for a dox" versus "rain claimed that he would not compile information for a dox" are two VERY different statements, the original reflects what actually historically happened. The CivClassics team did "intervene" because it was unprecedented that they would make a public post regarding ban details, and they did so because I asked them to intervene... I was in fact banned for "Have a good day." as per the citation, please stick to what staff have officially stated
m (Black Internationale is spelled correctly, that was the name of the organization, please refer to the newly provided citation... RainofPain was the username of the player, it was not "RainOfPain", please refer to the provided citation... Please do not name Owain in the section title, I went out of my way not to name him at all - plus most people remember it as "rain doxxed someone" and not "someone doxxed owain".)
m ("rain did not compile information for a dox" versus "rain claimed that he would not compile information for a dox" are two VERY different statements, the original reflects what actually historically happened. The CivClassics team did "intervene" because it was unprecedented that they would make a public post regarding ban details, and they did so because I asked them to intervene... I was in fact banned for "Have a good day." as per the citation, please stick to what staff have officially stated)
Line 112:
Rain argues that he never looked at the account before posting the image, nor did he intend to dox the user. However, his action was seen as an attempt to dox the user, of which this user was from Acadia. As a result of this, people called for Rain to be banned from CivClassics.
 
Rain counter-argued that he didn't mean to harm, and pointed out that if someone in his situation truly wanted to cause harm that they could. He argued that if his intent actually was to dox this user, then he would have looked through the alt accounts' posts and comments gathering as much details and personal information, compile it together, then publish it publicly - which he claimsdid he wouldn'tnot do.
 
The CivClassics staff team would temporarily ban Rain for one month. This struck less observant users as weird, because doxers are almost always permanently banned. However, the CivClassics staff team understood that doxing the user was accidental, and no personal details were gathered. To calm the community and at the request of Rain, theythe CivClassics staff team intervened and made a post on their Subreddit explaining the circumstances and situation surrounding their decision.<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/civclassics/comments/pv6iji/rainie_ban_details/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 CivClassics staff team makes public statement regarding "Rainie Ban Detials]"</ref><ref>[https://i.imgur.com/AUhGJoU.png RainOfPain125 modmail to r/CivClassics staff team, requesting them to intervene and make a "formal statement" regarding his ban to clear things up in the community]</ref><ref>[https://i.imgur.com/kSbicOl.png RainOfPain125 modmail to r/CivClassics staff team Part 2]</ref>
 
The user would later go on to say that they would not pre-ban Rain from his server, because "The dox was real but I do not believe it was intended as one."<ref>[https://i.imgur.com/I77uegc.jpg Clearing up rumors of Doxxing]</ref> The alt username and time that the incident occurred will not be added for privacy and safety.
Line 128:
Rain was banned from Devoted for no reason provided.
===CivRev===
Rain was permanently banned from CivRev for his"Have historya withgood Owainday."<ref>[https://i.imgur.com/4P5ES39.png CivRev staff banning Rain for "Have a good day."]</ref>
===CivMC===
Rain is permanently banned from CivMC for "past activities", most likely because of the Owain incident.
257

edits