Pavia: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 132:
 
In the early hours of the 20th of August, reports came through to Elysian Pact high command that SPQR infrastructure was under assault by a contingent of Rhode Island forces, made up of Adderral, HOODRATSLAYA, RonPaul & Dollaz. Estalia took the initiative to assemble a sizable force of fighters from Pavia, Jorvik & Estalia to counter-attack RI in SPQR, led by S4NTA & Gregy165 and supported by BritishWanderer, Gobblin, Quinndolin, Stardarkness, thejkh, tomyy789. Upon the Estalian response force's arrival into SPQR, the Rhode Island fighters promptly fled west thought by the Estalian force to be fleeing back towards their home country. However, the Rhode Island forces would loop south by 2000 metres and land on the shores of Pavia which was left virtually undefended with most of the present Elysian Pact pvpers in southern SPQR, Walkers from Estalia engaged in a 4v1 clash in the fields of Pavia whilst the Elysian Pact force made it's way back down south, attempting to cut off any potential escape by the Rhode Islanders. The Rhode Island combatants, having successfully baited the Elysian Pact forces north and now back south, took flight back west towards Rhode Island before any causalities were realised.
 
===== Emergence of the Pavian Coalition =====
Following on from the initial Call to Arms by the Principality of Pavia<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/wr2bzv/a_call_to_arms_from_the_principality_of_pavia_and/</ref>, on the 21st, the Duke of Bedford renewed his call to arms in a new Reddit post, stating that, despite continued attacks by Rhode Island, "Pavia, the Principality, and our Coalition of allies remain standing strong, successfully holding the Lyrean front against all odds." BritishWanderer dubbed the group consisting of Pavia, its allied countries as well as individuals who help it as the Coalition or the Pavian Coalition.
 
== Duchies of Pavia ==
Line 601 ⟶ 604:
|
|'''P'''
|<div style="text-align: center;">Amending the Magna Pavia for greater clarity about Crown Prince elections needing a ''majority'' vote, not simply a plurality. This was to reflect the existing precedent of Crown Princes being elected via majorities only.</div>
''majority'' vote, not simply a plurality. This was to reflect the existing precedent of Crown Princes
being elected via majorities only.</div>
|}
 
549

edits