Based talk:CivWikistan: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Metriximor in topic Neutrality and verifiability
Content added Content deleted
(→Neutrality and verifiability: Warning readded) |
m (Text replacement - "Civclassic" to "CivClassic") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I can confirm all of this is 100% real and verifiable. Please do not question CivWiki authorities. Thank you. --[[User:Metriximor|Metriximor]] ([[User talk:Metriximor|talk]]) 11:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC) |
I can confirm all of this is 100% real and verifiable. Please do not question CivWiki authorities. Thank you. --[[User:Metriximor|Metriximor]] ([[User talk:Metriximor|talk]]) 11:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
: [[File:Symbol declined.svg|alt=no|20px]] '''{{{1|Disagree}}}''' Given that the articles does not actually relate to any nation physically present in |
: [[File:Symbol declined.svg|alt=no|20px]] '''{{{1|Disagree}}}''' Given that the articles does not actually relate to any nation physically present in CivClassic, I have re-added the warning, but have used the new factual inaccuracy template. Please do not not remove this warning without consensus on this talk page. — [[User:Skinny|<span style="color: #ff69b4">Skinny</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Skinny|talk]]/[[Special:Contribs/Skinny|contribs]])</sup> 04:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
:: [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|alt=yes|20px]] '''{{{1|Agree}}}''' I feel like you're missing the joke here... Hmm... Well in any case it's true, you're right, we should apply the same criteria that was applied to [[Starongia]] --[[User:Metriximor|Metriximor]] ([[User talk:Metriximor|talk]]) 04:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:40, 4 July 2021
Neutrality and verifiability
Due to the lack of verifiable information contained in the article, I am unsure of the neutrality of the article. The content of the article consequently appears to be fictitious. Could we get some consensus on the viability of the article? — Skinny (talk/contribs) 01:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
I can confirm all of this is 100% real and verifiable. Please do not question CivWiki authorities. Thank you. --Metriximor (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree Given that the articles does not actually relate to any nation physically present in CivClassic, I have re-added the warning, but have used the new factual inaccuracy template. Please do not not remove this warning without consensus on this talk page. — Skinny (talk/contribs) 04:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agree I feel like you're missing the joke here... Hmm... Well in any case it's true, you're right, we should apply the same criteria that was applied to Starongia --Metriximor (talk) 04:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)