Alliances of Civcraft 2.0: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2:
In contrast to the sprawling network of alliances many were used to from [[CivClassic 2.0]], only a handful of alliances existed on [[Civcraft 2.0]] and had very little overlap between them ([[Hjaltland]] being the most notable example as they were in both the North East Alliance and the Great Northern Alliance). Almost every alliance that did exist besides the [[World Police]] was also quadrant-based. Every quadrant had at least one alliance to which eligibility was entirely determined by if a nation was located in that quadrant. Each alliance had different characteristics and levels of oversight and authority over their members, but they were almost always military alliances in some form.
 
===Alliances Active by EOTW===
 
[[File:Gna_flag.png|20px]] '''[[Great Northern Alliance]]''' (GNA)
Line 74:
The Western Alliance was not a typical alliance of sovereign states but rather the dominion over which the nation of Aeon ruled. Aeon was a large, respected, and casual nation founded in early 2014 in the deep -,-, and so when other, smaller buildfriend nations popped up nearby, some of them opted to submit themselves to Aeonite sovereignty for protection. A year after its foundation, Thule proposed a formal structure to the Western Empire, but talks died out before one could be fleshed out.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/CivAeon/comments/30wvox/the_western_empire/</ref> By the end of 2.0, most of the Western Empire had gone inactive, though Thule moved on to be an independent nation on Civcraft 3.0, and dsclouse, a founder of Aeon, was a founding admin of CivClassic 2.0.
 
=== Alliances Defunct by EOTW ===
 
[[File:Chanada.png|20px]] '''[[Chanada]]'''
1,269

edits