Talk:Royal House of Astonia: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1:
== Auction ==
As the lands were declared by Astonia to Adina in source [1], they had the right to do what they pleased; which was done in an auction as attested in source [2]. While discord screenshots are generally not regarded as proof, there is no reason to believe Adina's action of putting it to auction was illegitimate under Adinan law, and the jurisdiction was not in Astonia's to determine whether the auction was illegal as the land was already passed to Adina. Therefore whoever had the passing of lands of Astonia was legal, so the edits made by User:MrJoCrafter were reverted. [[User:Specificlanguage|Specificlanguage]] ([[User talk:Specificlanguage|talk]]) 20:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Line 110 ⟶ 4:
: "Astonia is moving, its '''lands''' now belong to Adina." As this is a page about the '''royal house''' of Astonia, and not the ''nation'' of [[Astonia]], this declaration of surrender does not apply. "there is no reason to believe Adina's action of putting it to auction was illegitimate under Adinan law" this is a page about '''Astonian''' tradition and royal law though. Adinan law doesn't apply. I at no point stated that imperator nor any adinan had any right to the '''throne''', only the '''physical land itself'''. Also, removing "(Icenian/Bloomean/Adinan Occupying Regime)" from 7misun is also just inaccurate. In addition, validity of claims on this page should not be considered for Imperator, as he has a [[Orthodoxy|long history]] [[Adinan History|on this wiki]] of lying about my nations in general and me in particular. - [[User:MrJoCrafter|MrJoCrafter]] [[User talk:MrJoCrafter|(talk)]] 20:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:: 7minsun was the owner of the lands of Astonia in CC, and even if he had no rights to the 'throne' and the explanation of the means of coming to "power" are proven then no action is necessary. If anything, 7minsun as the de facto "king" of the land as in general. If you disregard anyone who rules over a land who is generally not the king, then you could basically erase [[w:Oliver Cromwell]] from history. I would also warn against using the term "Pretenders" as that gives a negative tone; a better term could be "Rulers of Non-Lineage" or something. While this is about the Royal House of Astonia, the Astonian tradition should definitely consider people who ruled over lands that *were* Astonia's, as that could factor into your culture, as if lands were critical to your culture in the first place. If you really care enough about 7minsun's nationality, that can be readded, it's essentially saying somebody like [[w:George I]] was the ruler of England despite the fact being from Hanover. Finally, Imperator has generally been giving good and valid edits and (as he wishes) replies to this thread with **good-natured** counterarguments; I assure you he's editing in good faith, and you should do the same with a more congenial tone. This action wasn't vandalism and instead of outright deleting you should contact the parties in question should you disagree before mindlessly editing a page. [[User:Specificlanguage|Specificlanguage]] ([[User talk:Specificlanguage|talk]]) 20:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:: <blockquote>Logic re: "Pretenders": people who ''claimed'' the throne or seized it without recognition from the official authority. Both Evann (declared by a foreign power) and 7misun ("given" throne by someone with no authority to delegate that) fall under that category. Misun qualifies as a pretender despite having ''de-facto'' control over Richland Lakes because this page is about the ''royal law'', not the ''de-facto'' political situation, and as an unrecognized royal, he fits that category. And no, imperator has made many, many bad-faith edits and false or exaggerated claims about me and others on this wiki, e.g. claiming the aurum v astonia conflict was provoked by "astonian militarism" when that is objectively false, claiming astonia was a "haven for adinan monarchist radicals" which is laughable, and claiming that Arlington (also my nation) destroyed his house way, WAY back on First Light. - [[User:MrJoCrafter|MrJoCrafter]] [[User talk:MrJoCrafter|(talk)]] 21:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)<blockquote>Foremostly I would like to address the specific allegations of false or exaggerated claims against me, this being the appropriate forum for doing so. The claim that I made the assertion that the Aurum-Astonia conflict was caused by "astonian militarism" is not borne out by the edit history of [[Adinan History]]. As of the 4th of March 2021, before you had made any amendments to the page, the only usage of the word "militarism" is stating the reason that the Astonian Treaty was signed- the original wording being that it "would be signed to contain the blatant militarism of the Astonian Emperor SinjoroJoCrafter." I believe this is an accurate paraphrasing of the reasoning given within the document itself (describing [[SinjoroJoCrafter]] as a "lit fuse that would go off at any second - if not kept in check"). It accurately portrays the intention of the parties to the treaty. However even if the use of "blatant" were to be construed as a non-neutral phrase in the article, its usage would nonetheless be borne out by the facts. Astonia had been party to very many conflicts during its existence that are attested to on the wiki- such as the secession from Adina, second war with Adina, pearl-on-sighting the entirety of SPQR, the fact that a tribunal in Icenia convicted for a killing based on denying Astonian titles within Icenian borders (can be verified through their discord but for brevity I have attached the verdict and some of the evidence<ref
[[User:ImperatorMendes|ImperatorMendes]] ([[User talk:ImperatorMendes|talk]]) 22:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
|