Talk:Battle of Eddie Murphy: Difference between revisions
m (Just a little reminder :)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
WNS2: Please provide evidence for at least some of your claims in the future, and stop filling the page with one-sided bullshit. Thank you. (if you want to write and back up your side of the story, that's fine, but deleting ours is ridiculous). |
WNS2: Please provide evidence for at least some of your claims in the future, and stop filling the page with one-sided bullshit. Thank you. (if you want to write and back up your side of the story, that's fine, but deleting ours is ridiculous). |
||
Zenos - I dont think I have removed any chunks of text other than small corrections, but the addition you just made it filled with opinionated, irrelevant junk |
Revision as of 21:47, 25 November 2021
Topic - Commanders.
Zenos11: There are seriously too many commanders here, I do not like that user MrJoCrafter undid this without talking about it but it ruins the infobox and makes it far too large. I do not recognize half of these names, it looks like it is just people that were involved to any extent that are listed when it should be a small selection of actual leaders and not people trying to get their name out there, they can be mentioned in the description if needed
MrJoCrafter: I didn't make the long commanders list; I actually made it shorter. Take that up with yodabird.
Zenos - I didn't say you made the big list i said i didnt like you nuking the big list without first talking about it, you got the page locked bozo
WNS2: Please provide evidence for at least some of your claims in the future, and stop filling the page with one-sided bullshit. Thank you. (if you want to write and back up your side of the story, that's fine, but deleting ours is ridiculous).
Zenos - I dont think I have removed any chunks of text other than small corrections, but the addition you just made it filled with opinionated, irrelevant junk