Talk:Acadia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(clarification) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
You may provide references and links yourself, especially in [[Acadia#The First TNSC Crisis]]. If you are arguing about the No State Commune and are one of the most prolific editors for it, it is your responsibility instead of putting a POV warning on top of the page. |
You may provide references and links yourself, especially in [[Acadia#The First TNSC Crisis]]. If you are arguing about the No State Commune and are one of the most prolific editors for it, it is your responsibility instead of putting a POV warning on top of the page. |
||
--- |
|||
July 2nd 2022 RainOfPain125 |
|||
okay, next time please put a notice in your edit that you've posted something to the discussion page. I'm editing articles from my phone which is way more difficult. Sorry for undoing it, because I didn't notice you added to the discussion. |
|||
Sure I certainly could provide the references and alternative perspective myself, however as a gesture of good faith I was giving Acadia the chance to provide our perspective their way, in a way they might find most agreeable and we may find tolerable. Then we could both agree to remove the neutrality notice. |
|||
Because the alternative is I'd start removing all the claims that they could not substatiate, then I write what factually happened with evidence, and then get threatened with a ban because I'm "destroying or harming" the page. Then it'll become a back-and-forth shitshow til I get banned for """being aggressive""" in the discussion page or some nonsense like that, or the discussion goes on forever and they simply keep the neutrality notice indefinitely (see: my own page). |
|||
TLDR I was trying to save trouble by letting Acadia manage their own page but apparently I should do it myself. |