Talk:Acadia: Difference between revisions
m
being funny
No edit summary |
m (being funny) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 22:
You may provide references and links yourself, especially in [[Acadia#The First TNSC Crisis]]. If you are arguing about the No State Commune and are one of the most prolific editors for it, it is your responsibility instead of putting a POV warning on top of the page.
---
July 2nd 2022 RainOfPain125
okay, next time please put a notice in your edit that you've posted something to the discussion page. I'm editing articles from my phone which is way more difficult. Sorry for undoing it, because I didn't notice you added to the discussion.
Sure I certainly could provide the references and alternative perspective myself, however as a gesture of good faith I was giving Acadia the chance to provide our perspective their way, in a way they might find most agreeable and we may find tolerable. Then we could both agree to remove the neutrality notice.
Because the alternative is I'd start removing all the claims that they could not substatiate, then I write what factually happened with evidence, and then get threatened with a ban because I'm "destroying or harming" the page. Then it'll become a back-and-forth shitshow til I get banned for """being aggressive""" in the discussion page or some nonsense like that, or the discussion goes on forever and they simply keep the neutrality notice indefinitely (see: my own page).
TLDR I was trying to save trouble by letting Acadia manage their own page but apparently I should do it myself.
---
July 2nd 2022 specificlanguage
I would highly suggest editing CivWiki on a computer as that's the intended way of editing :)
---
July 2nf 2022 RainOfPain125
android > windows
| |||