Jomsviking-England Incident: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
Yodabird19 (talk | contribs) (made a page, finally) |
Yodabird19 (talk | contribs) m (fixed line breaks in the infobox) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| image = [[File:jorvik.png|300px]] |
| image = [[File:jorvik.png|300px]] |
||
| caption = Members of the [[Jomsviking Confederation]] lay claim to the [[City of England]] |
| caption = Members of the [[Jomsviking Confederation]] lay claim to the [[City of England]] |
||
| combatant1 = |
| combatant1 = {{flag|City of England}}<br> |
||
⚫ | |||
{{flag|City of England}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{flag| |
{{flag|NDI}} Alliance<br> |
||
{{flag| |
{{flag|NWO}} Alliance<br> |
||
⚫ | |||
{{flag|Eon Empire}} |
{{flag|Eon Empire}} |
||
| combatant2 = |
| combatant2 = {{flag|Jomsviking Confederation}}<br> |
||
⚫ | |||
{{flag|Jomsviking Confederation}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{flag|Kallos}} |
{{flag|Kallos}} |
||
| result = |
| result = [[Jomsviking Confederation]] backs down |
||
[[Jomsviking Confederation]] backs down |
|||
[[#Collapse_of_the_Plus-Minus_Concordat|Collapse of Plus-Minus Concordat]] |
[[#Collapse_of_the_Plus-Minus_Concordat|Collapse of Plus-Minus Concordat]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''Jomsviking-England Incident''', also known as the '''Jomsviking Invasion of England''' or the '''Jorvik Crisis''', was a diplomatic dispute over the sovereignty of the [[City of England]], brought on by the [[Jomsviking Confederation]]. |
The '''Jomsviking-England Incident''', also known as the '''Jomsviking Invasion of England''' or the '''Jorvik Crisis''', was a diplomatic dispute over the sovereignty of the [[City of England]], brought on by the [[Jomsviking Confederation]]. |
||
==Context== |
==Context== |
||
Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
===New English Relations=== |
===New English Relations=== |
||
In the wake of the [[PMC]]'s collapse, [[City of England|England]] quickly set out to establish relationships with as many close nations as possible; at this it succeeded, securing arrangements with [[Acadia]], [[Imperial Kingdom of Fish|Fish]], [[Avalon]], and [[Mythril]] almost immediately. It applied for [[Augustan Federation]] membership, but was denied. [[City of England|England]] later joined the [[NDI]] as an Administrator (IE developed, leading nation) on November 24. |
In the wake of the [[PMC]]'s collapse, [[City of England|England]] quickly set out to establish relationships with as many close nations as possible; at this it succeeded, securing arrangements with [[Acadia]], [[Imperial Kingdom of Fish|Fish]], [[Avalon]], and [[Mythril]] almost immediately. It applied for [[Augustan Federation]] membership, but was denied. [[City of England|England]] later joined the [[NDI]] as an Administrator (IE developed, leading nation) on November 24. |
||
===AMIGOS=== |
=== AMIGOS=== |
||
The Allied Mission for an International Guard Of Sovereignty, or [[AMIGOS]], was publicized on November 25, 2021, as a direct successor to the [[PMC]]. Three out of the four member states of [[AMIGOS]] at the time of its creation - [[Kallos]], [[Jomsviking Confederation|Jomsviking]], and [[Sussex]] - were members of the [[PMC]] prior to its collapse. The [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18PhHrBLOBNCOkJPdku5_vbUneN0RjEfVK5Tdkq5z48o/edit AMIGOS charter] explicitly sets out that "members are not permitted to carry out offensive operations on each other, as that would be in direct violation of the defense & peace agreement of this treaty" - an improvement over its predecessor, if respected. |
The Allied Mission for an International Guard Of Sovereignty, or [[AMIGOS]], was publicized on November 25, 2021, as a direct successor to the [[PMC]]. Three out of the four member states of [[AMIGOS]] at the time of its creation - [[Kallos]], [[Jomsviking Confederation|Jomsviking]], and [[Sussex]] - were members of the [[PMC]] prior to its collapse. The [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18PhHrBLOBNCOkJPdku5_vbUneN0RjEfVK5Tdkq5z48o/edit AMIGOS charter] explicitly sets out that "members are not permitted to carry out offensive operations on each other, as that would be in direct violation of the defense & peace agreement of this treaty" - an improvement over its predecessor, if respected. |
||