Template talk:POV: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Metriximor in topic RfC: Split of usage of this template into potential new factual accuracy template
Content added Content deleted
Metriximor (talk | contribs) m (added my opinion) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should this template be split into the additional use of a potential new factual accuracy template? Wikipedia uses [[W:Template:Disputed|this template]]. Here, it is clear that the problem identified with the article is that it is not factually accurate. There can be a marked difference between factual inaccuracies and partial points of view. Consequently, I would ask whether it would be preferable to split these into two separate templates and correspondingly update and expand upon the NPOV policy in the editing guide? — [[User:Skinny|<span style="color: #ff69b4">Skinny</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Skinny|talk]]/[[Special:Contribs/Skinny|contribs]])</sup> 11:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
Should this template be split into the additional use of a potential new factual accuracy template? Wikipedia uses [[W:Template:Disputed|this template]]. Here, it is clear that the problem identified with the article is that it is not factually accurate. There can be a marked difference between factual inaccuracies and partial points of view. Consequently, I would ask whether it would be preferable to split these into two separate templates and correspondingly update and expand upon the NPOV policy in the editing guide? — [[User:Skinny|<span style="color: #ff69b4">Skinny</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Skinny|talk]]/[[Special:Contribs/Skinny|contribs]])</sup> 11:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
Personally, I agree and think it is a brilliant idea. --[[User:Metriximor|Metriximor]] ([[User talk:Metriximor|talk]]) 13:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:16, 5 March 2020
RfC: Split of usage of this template into potential new factual accuracy template
Should this template be split into the additional use of a potential new factual accuracy template? Wikipedia uses this template. Here, it is clear that the problem identified with the article is that it is not factually accurate. There can be a marked difference between factual inaccuracies and partial points of view. Consequently, I would ask whether it would be preferable to split these into two separate templates and correspondingly update and expand upon the NPOV policy in the editing guide? — Skinny (talk/contribs) 11:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Personally, I agree and think it is a brilliant idea. --Metriximor (talk) 13:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)