Talk:Collapse of Eddie Murphy: Difference between revisions
m
update
Yodabird19 (talk | contribs) (resolved the criteria) |
Kaloa Saint (talk | contribs) m (update) |
||
Line 6:
The contested 1568-byte edit destroys information for no reason. Yes, citations are added to "make the article seem more legitimate" - why else would citations be added? If the citations "incriminate the opposite person", that is not their or my fault. Looking over the six citations that you tried to delete, each one absolutely supports the point that it's affixed to (including the barrel one); certainly, some are indirect or imperfect (such as the barrel one), but I'm not going to paste an entire Discord conversation's worth of context into a citation just to meet some "criteria". There ''are'' no valid "criteria before reverting this change", so they're vacuously met. Edit reverted again, please don't continue on this point. - yodabird19 13:09, 1 November 2021 (EST)
The statement provided makes no logical sense. Correct the sentences the citations are applied to that way the match the applied material. Currently these citations are applied to sentences that they have either no relation to, or the sentence does not properly represent said citation. Please follow up on having a 3rd party look over said citations before they are re-applied. Thank you for your compliance. - Kaloa_HG 11:31, 1 November 2021 (PST)
| |||