Butternut–SEC War: Difference between revisions
m
This wording warrants a citation. Icenia's CivMC, Civclassics 2.0, and Civcraft 2.0 pages all state that ChrisChrispie's the founder, and NovaKaiserin's reddit seldom mentions Icenia. That said there's been no real opposition to the founder-claim on their post. They're probably a founder/enabler of Icenia's founding on an older iteration. Either way, the "founder of Icenia" claim should either be cited or should be rewritten as to not imply them being a recent founder or current dissident.
(updating another pearl counter and new pearl from skybridge incident) |
m (This wording warrants a citation. Icenia's CivMC, Civclassics 2.0, and Civcraft 2.0 pages all state that ChrisChrispie's the founder, and NovaKaiserin's reddit seldom mentions Icenia. That said there's been no real opposition to the founder-claim on their post. They're probably a founder/enabler of Icenia's founding on an older iteration. Either way, the "founder of Icenia" claim should either be cited or should be rewritten as to not imply them being a recent founder or current dissident.) |
||
Line 72:
An opinion poll asking the global community their opinions on the war showed that support for SEC forces was 60%, compared to Butternut's 40%.<ref>https://redd.it/14783s9</ref>
On 13 June, [[NovaKaiserin]], founder of Icenia {{Citation needed}}, denounced current Icenia and wished Butternut and Gang Shi luck in “the process of its removal.” <ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/1487y7x/denouncing_icenia_from_the_desk_of_its_founder/</ref>
On 14 June, Civ server developer and designer [[CaptainKlutz]] posted a satirical essay expressing frustration over the mindsets of the parties involved of Civ as a game to be won instead of as a collaborative creative medium.<ref> https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/1498qg3/my_complete_thorough_researched_and_illustrated/</ref>
| |||