Annexation of Kū: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Hitobashuru (talk | contribs) (Added map) |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 7:
| result = '''Estalian Victory'''<br/>
*[[Communion of Kū]] annexed by [[Estalia]]<br/>
*Sanctions & embargoes against Estalia by various nations
| combatant1 = {{flag|Estalia}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|Communion of Kū}}
Line 17 ⟶ 18:
{{flagicon|Communion of Kū}} Black_Fusion <br/>
| strength1 =
11 Fighters
| strength2 =
8 Civilians
}}
Line 39 ⟶ 40:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vewsg6/estalians_kill_k%C5%ABtoan_officials_in_their_own_land/</ref>, accusing Estalia of knowingly ignoring their nation's claims and building around any stone-reinforced areas on the island.
[[File:Anti estalia post 1.png|thumb|An example of a popular anti-Estalia post on the subreddit in the aftermath of the annexation.<ref name=":4">[https://old.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgmerc/who_wants_to_be_next/ https://reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgmerc/who_wants_to_be_next/]</ref>]]
=== Demands and Annexation ===
In response to these accusations, Estalia made their own post<ref name=":2" />, stating that Kū officials had been inconsistent on whether or not they could keep the tunnel, and that Estalia had sent demands<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgkt62/comment/id240w4/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3</ref> (including the stipulations "Ku will not cede sovereignty to any group[...]" and "
=== Public Reaction ===
The annexation provoked a reaction of anger in the comments of the post<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgkt62/comment/id23rqs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgkt62/comment/id1z6vq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3</ref><ref name=":3">https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vgkt62/comment/id20hbq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3</ref> (some such comments obtaining more upvotes than the original post by a wide margin), with large parts of the civ community feeling this was an unjust solution and imperialistic, as well as contrary to the image Estalia originally wanted to keep of themselves<ref name=":3" />. The reaction through proper posts on the subreddit (as opposed to comments) also seemed to be largely anti-Estalian<ref
On June 21st, Black_Fusion made another post regarding the annexation<ref name=":0" />, recapping the situation and asking of the international community three actions: "an international embargo to contain Estalian expansionism"; "no recognition to be given to Occupied Kū or any puppet states which may be set up in the region that are not composed of its native people"; and "the declaration that Estalian players may not be armed or armored in any free-world nation".
====
On June 22nd, an embargo banning the trade of "Goods or Services within the Borders of Estalia by a state or participating citizen" as well as with any Estalians "outside of their borders, within participating states or on the private property of participating citizens" was signed<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tZnPFsBMIMr6xfMC136uMd8uMlEiHjvHMkpRu3LRAf4/edit
from:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vifejw/a_response_to_estalia/</ref> by 11 nations, the nations being: [[Communion of Kū|Kū itself]], the [[CCTT]], Yggdrasil, [[Rhode Island]], Camiseo, [[the Potistani Host]], [[Myra]], Gensokyo, Melia, [[境界の西部共和国|the People’s Republic of Western Boundary]] and the Empire of Khan, with Topaz4293 stating that the embargo "may be adopted at any time as well as dropped at any time"<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/CivMC/comments/vifejw/a_response_to_estalia/</ref>.
==References==
<references />
[[Category:Conflicts (CivMC)]]
| |||