Template talk:POV

RfC: Split of usage of this template into potential new factual accuracy template
Should this template be split into the additional use of a potential new factual accuracy template? Wikipedia uses this template. Here, it is clear that the problem identified with the article is that it is not factually accurate. There can be a marked difference between factual inaccuracies and partial points of view. Consequently, I would ask whether it would be preferable to split these into two separate templates and correspondingly update and expand upon the NPOV policy in the editing guide? — Skinny  (talk/contribs) 11:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)