Civcraft2Import:Talk/people/start

This page has actually turned out pretty sad. I know some people are enforcing an unwritten rule &quot;don't make your own page, this is meant for significant people&quot;, but at this point, I think the best approach would just be to try and get everyone to write a little blurb about themselves, anything from one liners to fucking novels if they want. The point is largely to get a good idea about what people are like, even if it doesn't turn into a perfectly documented, neutral database over people's history and involvement. I think it would be more helpful to have something universally inclusive (even if biased or inaccurate on a case by case basis) than to limit it to the most important people. -Ogel6000, 2014/27/08/

Not sure what should be done about this page, I feel like it should be more factual rather than just silly one line jokes. Or maybe have the little jokes but create a page on each person that goes into their history and such which would explain the jokes. Also maybe it could be rebranded as &quot;individuals&quot; so people can include pages on other entities, for example Prussia's royal family is made up of chickens and cats, would be nice to be able to include pages on them as well. --- // Green 2014/07/26 01:19//

I think we should do a cull of this page, it's pretty pathetic right now and I'm glad it can only be found by going to the index. I don't think politicians or businessman or whatever should be included for groupings of people; this seems to reflect more about what people think of themselves rather than any factual category. Developers seem to be a fair and objective category, perhaps admins too. Would city leaders be something we want to categorize someone as? Or perhaps we only want to note people significant for historical things, rather than just city leaders or random businessmen(which is closer to how things work on actual wikipedia). In any case, I'm going to start culling the page, if you have some input on categories let me know. -Xavter 2015/7/6

Agreeing that this page should be removed for reasons already stated by Xavter. -Ipslore 10/7/2015